← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexa Niccum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 USHS-MN-W 23 6 10 16 0.696 0.1051 0.1051
2020-21 Orono High USHS-MN-W 20 9 17 26 1.300 0.1963 0.1963
2021-22 Orono High USHS-MN-W 30 13 22 35 1.167 0.1762 0.1762
2022-23 Orono High USHS-MN-W 28 12 19 31 1.107 0.1672 0.1635
2023-24 Orono High USHS-MN-W 30 7 13 20 0.667 0.1007 0.0942
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SO 31 10 23 33 1.065
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 30 8 26 34 1.133
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.13
2024-25 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+985.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5666
Forward overall
#244
Forward born in 2006
#1204
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.