IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddie Hulter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2019-20 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 17 13 30 1.200 0.1812 0.1812 — —
2020-21 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 16 11 27 1.350 0.2039 0.2039 — —
2021-22 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 26 25 51 1.962 0.2962 0.2962 — —
2022-23 Fergus Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 32 33 65 2.241 0.3385 0.3033 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 28 10 20 30 1.071
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 28 4 12 16 0.571
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 26 7 9 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+139.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1931
Forward overall
#73
Forward born in 2004
#145
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Molly Strabley
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.