IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashlyn Abrahamson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Devils Lake High USHS-W 14 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Devils Lake High USHS-W 26 14 16 30 1.154 0.3469 0.3469 — —
2020-21 Devils Lake High USHS-W 17 8 5 13 0.765 0.2299 0.2299 — —
2021-22 Devils Lake High USHS-W 17 19 4 23 1.353 0.4068 0.4068 — —
2022-23 Devils Lake High USHS-W 23 45 10 55 2.391 0.7191 0.7191 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC — 28 13 15 28 1.000
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC — 26 12 12 24 0.923
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.55
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2024-25 · Hamline
+66.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#675
Forward overall
#23
Forward born in 2006
#229
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.75 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.68 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aly Tremblay
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.78 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Detert
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Guagliardo
Mercyhurst ·
0.156 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.