IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phoebe Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-09 Country: Australia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 4 1 1 2 0.500 0.1169 0.1169 — —
2021-22 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 29 6 2 8 0.276 0.0645 0.0645 — —
2022-23 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 23 5 6 11 0.478 0.1119 0.1119 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 — JR 23 14 12 26 1.130
2024-25 Arcadia D3 — — 27 15 6 21 0.778
2023-24 Arcadia D3 — — 24 5 8 13 0.542
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2023-24 · Arcadia
+580.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8591
Forward overall
#366
Forward born in 2005
#101
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sofia Poinar
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Janna Haeg
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kendall Williamson
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sofia Poinar
Minnesota State ·
0.028 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.