IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mia Cheesebrough Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 19 2 2 4 0.210 0.0318 0.0318 — —
2021-22 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 27 3 6 9 0.333 0.0503 0.0503 — —
2022-23 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 27 3 17 20 0.741 0.1118 0.1090 — —
2023-24 Two Rivers/St. Paul (W) USHS-MN-W 26 2 3 5 0.192 0.0290 0.0271 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hood College D3 — SO 23 8 16 24 1.044
2024-25 Hood College D3 — — 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2024-25 · Hood College
+446.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10753
Forward overall
#524
Forward born in 2006
#3673
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Megan Berg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Becca Gilmore
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG
Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Megan Berg
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Haley Mullins
Harvard ·
0.306 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Becca Gilmore
Harvard ·
1.167 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.