IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Haylee Kos Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 27 2 3 5 0.185 0.0433 0.0433 — —
2019-20 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 23 0 1 1 0.043 0.0102 0.0102 — —
2020-21 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Saskatoon Stars SFMAAAHL-W 28 3 3 6 0.214 0.0501 0.0501 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 — SR 27 10 13 23 0.852
2024-25 Arcadia D3 — — 27 10 16 26 0.963
2023-24 Arcadia D3 — — 25 12 14 26 1.040
2022-23 Arcadia D3 — — 26 7 8 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2022-23 · Arcadia
+1320.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13509
Forward overall
#622
Forward born in 2004
#249
in SFMAAAHL-W

D1 Comparables

Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Presley Norby
Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Laura Anderson
Yale ·
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Heise
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.