← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katherine Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 10 14 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2019-20 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 25 18 12 30 1.200 0.1812 0.1812
2020-21 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 18 15 9 24 1.333 0.2013 0.2013
2021-22 St. Cloud Crush USHS-MN-W 26 20 15 35 1.346 0.2033 0.2033
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC SR 27 10 11 21 0.778
2024-25 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 26 20 6 26 1.000
2023-24 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 30 6 5 11 0.367
2022-23 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 23 3 8 11 0.478
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2022-23 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+210.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3699
Forward overall
#162
Forward born in 2004
#531
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.