← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kate Haug Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.0362 0.0362
2018-19 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604
2019-20 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 25 8 14 22 0.880 0.1329 0.1329
2020-21 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 17 12 12 24 1.412 0.2132 0.2132
2021-22 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 27 25 18 43 1.593 0.2405 0.2405
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 26 11 9 20 0.769
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC 29 2 11 13 0.448
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W SO 13 0 1 1 0.077
2022-23 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 19 1 4 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · St. Thomas
+82.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3460
Forward overall
#148
Forward born in 2004
#482
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.826 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
1.185 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.