← New Search ↗ Social Card

Iyla Ryskamp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-01-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Orono High USHS-MN-W 25 3 8 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664
2018-19 Orono High USHS-MN-W 25 11 13 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2019-20 Orono High USHS-MN-W 25 26 28 54 2.160 0.3262 0.3262
2020-21 Orono High USHS-MN-W 20 23 16 39 1.950 0.2944 0.2944
2021-22 Orono High USHS-MN-W 30 47 43 90 3.000 0.4530 0.4530
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC 28 8 11 19 0.679
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC 26 11 6 17 0.654
2023-24 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 38 4 2 6 0.158
2022-23 Sacred Heart D1 NEWHA 29 8 4 12 0.414
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2022-23 · Sacred Heart
+46.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1195
Forward overall
#37
Forward born in 2004
#45
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.92 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.073 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.