← New Search ↗ Social Card

Memphis Mertens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Roseau High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 8 8 16 0.667 0.1007 0.1007
2019-20 Roseau High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 16 5 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268
2020-21 Roseau High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 23 26 49 2.333 0.3523 0.3523
2021-22 Roseau High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 28 8 36 1.333 0.2013 0.2013
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 25 7 10 17 0.680
2024-25 Concordia D3 25 6 7 13 0.520
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SO 32 3 4 7 0.219
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D3 SO 25 2 3 5 0.200
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 34 1 0 1 0.029
2022-23 Franklin Pierce D3 FR 34 1 0 1 0.029
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2022-23 · Franklin Pierce
-78.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2905
Forward overall
#120
Forward born in 2004
#335
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.324 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.