← New Search ↗ Social Card

Molly Pohlkamp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 21 0 3 3 0.143 0.0216 0.0216
2020-21 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 4 7 11 0.579 0.0874 0.0874
2021-22 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 5 6 11 0.379 0.0573 0.0573
2022-23 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 8 13 21 0.778 0.1174 0.1118
2023-24 Brainerd/Little Falls High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 10 2 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0660
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 27 7 9 16 0.593
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 25 13 10 23 0.920
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+1174.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8832
Forward overall
#411
Forward born in 2006
#2581
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.