← New Search ↗ Social Card

Molly Terebayza Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 24 1 6 7 0.292 0.0440 0.0440
2019-20 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 25 9 15 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2020-21 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 19 7 4 11 0.579 0.0874 0.0874
2021-22 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 27 16 23 39 1.444 0.2181 0.2181
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Olaf D3 26 9 10 19 0.731
2023-24 St. Olaf D3 24 14 9 23 0.958
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 26 13 6 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2022-23 · St. Olaf
+475.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4843
Forward overall
#903
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota State ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bemidji State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.