Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Cretin-Derham Hall (women) | USHS-MN-W | 25 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.200 | 0.0302 | 0.0302 |
| 2020-21 | Cretin-Derham Hall (women) | USHS-MN-W | 19 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0.789 | 0.1192 | 0.1192 |
| 2021-22 | Cretin-Derham Hall (women) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 0.778 | 0.1174 | 0.1174 |
| 2022-23 | Cretin-Derham Hall (women) | USHS-MN-W | 28 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 0.429 | 0.0647 | 0.0583 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Endicott | CNE | JR | 28 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.536 |
| 2024-25 | Endicott | NEHC | SO | 27 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 0.704 |
| 2023-24 | Endicott | NEHC | FR | 26 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.385 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gianna Kowalkoski | 2023-24 · 0.89 PPG | 0.167 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Kelsi Ries | 2023-24 · 0.89 PPG | 0.158 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Samantha Estes | 2013-14 · 0.36 PPG | 0.385 | Connecticut College | NESCAC |
| Anika Fortin | 2024-25 · 0.53 PPG | 0.278 | St. Norbert | NCHA |
| Sophie Grant | 2023-24 · 0.22 PPG | 0.654 | St. John Fisher | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.