IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noelle Hemr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 15 2 3 5 0.333 0.0503 0.0503 — —
2021-22 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 9 7 16 0.615 0.0929 0.0929 — —
2022-23 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 30 19 12 31 1.033 0.1560 0.1488 — —
2023-24 Centennial/SLP High (women) USHS-MN-W 28 15 18 33 1.179 0.1780 0.1624 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 28 9 5 14 0.500
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 28 13 14 27 0.964
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.96
2024-25 · Gustavus Adolphus
+617.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5165
Forward overall
#216
Forward born in 2006
#1012
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Semmel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sierra Semmel
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.