IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kayson Ruegge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U 19U-AAA-W 74 17 11 28 0.378 0.1288 0.1245 — —
2023-24 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U 19U-AAA-W 44 17 17 34 0.773 0.2631 0.2373 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 20 7 5 12 0.600
2025-26 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 20 7 5 12 0.600
2024-25 Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 28 5 9 14 0.500
2024-25 Plattsburgh State D3 — — 28 5 9 14 0.500
2024-25 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — — 28 5 9 14 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2024-25 · Plattsburgh
+204.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3643
Forward overall
#158
Forward born in 2004
#134
in 19U-AAA-W

D1 Comparables

Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kiki Radke
Bemidji State ·
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sara Hjalmarsson
Providence ·
0.657 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.