IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Annika Lindgren Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2018-19 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 14 21 0.840 0.1268 0.1268 — —
2019-20 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 14 18 32 1.333 0.2013 0.2013 — —
2020-21 Duluth High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 4 11 15 0.789 0.1192 0.1192 — —
2021-22 Duluth Marshall School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 12 38 50 2.083 0.3146 0.3146 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC — 28 7 5 12 0.429
2024-25 Hamline D3 MIAC — 24 3 7 10 0.417
2023-24 Hamline D3 MIAC — 24 5 9 14 0.583
2022-23 Hamline D3 MIAC — 22 4 2 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Hamline
+33.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3019
Forward overall
#126
Forward born in 2004
#364
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.09 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sylvia Marolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.32 No data
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.12 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
North Dakota ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sylvia Marolt
Bemidji State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.