Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | New Trier High | USHS-W | 7 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0.857 | 0.0728 | 0.0728 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | SR | 24 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.500 |
| 2024-25 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | JR | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 0.500 |
| 2024-25 | UConn | HEA-W | FR | 23 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.478 |
| 2023-24 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | SO | 24 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.417 |
| 2022-23 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | FR | 24 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.458 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Sierra Semmel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Liz Trautz | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG | 0.094 | Colgate |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autumn Burt | 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Jenna Horvat | 2022-23 · 0.50 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Eva Nelson | 2023-24 · 0.52 PPG | 0.393 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Ella Thoreson | 2024-25 · 0.39 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Audrey McClurg | 2024-25 · 0.52 PPG | — | Concordia | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.