← New Search ↗ Social Card

Natalie Ahern Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 0 2 0.080 0.0121 0.0121
2019-20 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483
2020-21 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 6 4 10 0.526 0.0795 0.0795
2021-22 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 17 12 29 1.160 0.1752 0.1752
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 27 5 7 12 0.444
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 27 5 8 13 0.481
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 19 3 1 4 0.211
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 26 5 2 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+185.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6788
Forward overall
#291
Forward born in 2003
#1630
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.