IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Laura Castronova Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Newark Ironbound 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 5 2 0 2 0.400 0.1362 0.1362 — —
2022-23 Newark Ironbound 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 69 6 14 20 0.290 0.0987 0.0987 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 NEHC — 26 6 4 10 0.385
2024-25 Plymouth State D3 NEHC — 27 13 6 19 0.704
2023-24 Plymouth State D3 NEHC — 26 4 0 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · Plymouth State
+58.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8073
Forward overall
#390
in 19U-AAA-W

D1 Comparables

Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sophia Kunin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jacqueline Kaasa
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mac Johnson
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Abby Halluska
Bemidji State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
Ohio State ·
0.278 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.