← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashtyn Bringardner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portsmouth Abbey School USHS-W 23 5 6 11 0.478 0.1438 0.1438
2021-22 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep-Girls 22 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep-Girls 27 22 26 48 1.780 1.1045 1.1045
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 NEHC 25 5 5 10 0.400
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 NEHC 27 8 6 14 0.519
2023-24 Salve Regina D3 NEHC 13 1 1 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2023-24 · Salve Regina
-87.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
38%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1198
Forward overall

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
1.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.09 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.