IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Briar Charchenko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Holy Family/Waconia High USHS-MN-W 23 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 25 2 1 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181 — —
2019-20 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 24 4 1 5 0.208 0.0315 0.0315 — —
2020-21 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 20 4 5 9 0.450 0.0679 0.0679 — —
2021-22 Holy Family Catholic (women) USHS-MN-W 28 2 6 8 0.286 0.0431 0.0431 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 28 5 5 10 0.357
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 31 4 5 9 0.290
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 28 4 2 6 0.214
2022-23 Adrian D3 NCHA — 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2022-23 · Adrian
+1666.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11867
Forward overall
#502
Forward born in 2003
#4356
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lucy Burton
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mallory Rushton
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie McMillan
Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucy Burton
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.