IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Kopek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Clinton High USHS-W 13 5 6 11 0.846 0.2545 0.2545 — —
2019-20 Clinton High USHS-W 18 7 14 21 1.167 0.3508 0.3508 — —
2020-21 Clinton High USHS-W 4 3 3 6 1.500 0.4511 0.4511 — —
2021-22 Clinton High USHS-W 12 12 16 28 2.333 0.7016 0.7016 — —
2022-23 Clinton High USHS-W 17 19 14 33 1.941 0.5837 0.5837 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 26 3 7 10 0.385
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 — — 26 11 10 21 0.808
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 — — 24 5 5 10 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.59
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2023-24 · SUNY Cortland
-29.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#549
Forward overall
#10
Forward born in 2005
#181
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.58 No data
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.60 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.54 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ivy Dynek
St. Cloud State ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.