IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Halle Dunleavy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Andover High USHS-MN-W 10 1 1 2 0.200 0.0302 0.0302 — —
2022-23 Andover High USHS-MN-W 31 3 5 8 0.258 0.0390 0.0349 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 4 5 9 0.360
2024-25 St. Catherine D3 — — 25 3 4 7 0.280
2023-24 St. Catherine D3 — — 14 3 1 4 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2023-24 · St. Catherine
+910.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13303
Forward overall
#615
Forward born in 2004
#5423
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lucy Burton
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lexi Edwards
Sacred Heart ·
0.323 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie McMillan
Penn State ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucy Burton
Yale ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.