← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashton Parnell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 0 2 0.080 0.0121 0.0121
2017-18 Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0362 0.0362
2018-19 Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 14 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027
2019-20 Camb-Isanti/Mora/PC (W) USHS-MN-W 25 28 17 45 1.800 0.2718 0.2718
2020-21 Northern Tier Stars (women) USHS-MN-W 19 8 12 20 1.053 0.1589 0.1589
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 27 2 7 9 0.333
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 28 5 6 11 0.393
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 27 7 9 16 0.593
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Superior
+268.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4137
Forward overall
#162
Forward born in 2003
#675
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.