Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | Swift Current Wildcats | SFMAAAHL-W | 25 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.400 | 0.0936 | 0.0936 |
| 2019-20 | Swift Current Wildcats | SFMAAAHL-W | 24 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0.708 | 0.1657 | 0.1657 |
| 2020-21 | Trinity Western Univ. | USports-W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Trinity Western Univ. | USports-W | 17 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.118 | 0.0517 | 0.0517 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Trine | NCHA | SO | 27 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2024-25 | Trine | NCHA | FR | 27 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0.296 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Presley Norby | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG | 0.525 | Wisconsin |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ella Thoreson | 2024-25 · 0.39 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Kayson Ruegge | 2022-23 · 0.38 PPG | 0.500 | SUNY Plattsburgh | SUNYAC |
| Autumn Burt | 2023-24 · 0.50 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Jenna Horvat | 2022-23 · 0.50 PPG | — | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Macy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.194 | Post | CHA-W |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.