Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.185 | 0.0280 | 0.0280 |
| 2022-23 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 9 | 13 | 22 | 0.815 | 0.1230 | 0.1205 |
| 2023-24 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 27 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 1.074 | 0.1622 | 0.1521 |
| 2024-25 | Chisago Lakes High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 1.000 | 0.1510 | 0.1358 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | St. Catherine | MIAC | FR | 24 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.333 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vilma Tanskanen | SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG | 0.182 | North Dakota |
| Lydia Passolt | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG | 0.095 | Bemidji State |
| Carly Bullock | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.812 | Princeton |
| Emily Antony | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG | 0.444 | Minnesota State |
| Amanda Bäckebo | SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG | 0.056 | Syracuse |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alyson Vogelsang | 2023-24 · 0.81 PPG | — | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Adrienne Hansen | 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG | 0.481 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Jana Lesch | 2023-24 · 1.44 PPG | 0.222 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Ella Hansen | 2023-24 · 0.65 PPG | 0.500 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Sam Mugge | 2015-16 · 0.80 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.