← New Search ↗ Social Card

Corsica Skibinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 JWHL-U16 21 3 4 7 0.333 0.0726 0.0726
2018-19 NAHA Red 16U JWHL-U16 23 6 5 11 0.478 0.1042 0.1042
2019-20 NAHA Red 16U JWHL-U16 24 6 10 16 0.667 0.1452 0.1452
2021-22 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 79 10 9 19 0.240 0.0819 0.0819
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nazareth D3 30 2 6 8 0.267
2024-25 Nazareth D3 29 6 5 11 0.379
2023-24 Nazareth D3 29 7 4 11 0.379
2022-23 Nazareth D3 26 4 8 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2022-23 · Nazareth
+494.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8154
Forward overall
#389
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.