IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maddie Andrle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 9 8 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
2019-20 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 4 9 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785 — —
2020-21 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 19 6 6 12 0.632 0.0954 0.0954 — —
2021-22 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 27 7 12 19 0.704 0.1063 0.1063 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 20 6 1 7 0.350
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 25 12 14 26 1.040
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 28 4 5 9 0.321
2022-23 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 — — 27 7 7 14 0.519
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+478.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7969
Forward overall
#2165
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kourtney Menches
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sofia Poinar
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kippin Keller
Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kourtney Menches
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Janna Haeg
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.