IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lyndi Schubert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 2 3 0.130 0.0197 0.0197 — —
2017-18 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 4 8 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725 — —
2018-19 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 7 5 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725 — —
2019-20 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 9 8 17 0.895 0.1351 0.1351 — —
2021-22 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 8 15 23 0.885 0.1336 0.1336 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Scholastica D3 — — 25 6 1 7 0.280
2024-25 St. Scholastica D3 — — 25 4 7 11 0.440
2023-24 St. Scholastica D3 — — 23 3 5 8 0.348
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 — — 25 2 0 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2022-23 · St. Scholastica
-14.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7517
Forward overall
#360
Forward born in 2004
#1951
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.