← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maggie Albers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 13 2 2 4 0.308 0.0465 0.0465
2021-22 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 21 9 2 11 0.524 0.0791 0.0791
2022-23 Osseo/Park Center (women) USHS-MN-W 25 7 7 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0780
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 25 5 2 7 0.280
2024-25 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 17 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 17 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC FR 19 2 1 3 0.158
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC 23 2 1 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2023-24 · Saint Mary's
+135.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9532
Forward overall
#399
Forward born in 2005
#2959
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.