← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Adrianna Kelsch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.11
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1339
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.25
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.2934
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
85%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2024-25 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 27 5 9 14 0.520 0.1689 0.1689
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 UMass Boston MASCAC FR 27 5 2 7 0.259

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Grace Zumwinkle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 1.000 Minnesota
Jordan Chancellor USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.517 Yale
Gabbie Hughes USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG 1.121 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Shelby Evans 2024-25 · 0.89 PPG — St. Scholastica NCHA
Andrea Noss 2013-14 · 0.52 PPG 0.667 SUNY Oswego SUNYAC
Emerson Hardwick 2025-26 · 0.90 PPG — Post NE10
Adrienne Hansen 2023-24 · 0.70 PPG 0.481 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Amber Meluzio 2024-25 · 0.79 PPG 0.464 Elmira UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.