← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keely Kasputis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Dexter Southfield NE-Prep-Girls 22 1 0 1 0.050 0.0310 0.0310
2018-19 Dexter Southfield NE-Prep-Girls 24 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New England D3 3 0 1 1 0.333
2023-24 New England D3 JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2022-23 New England D3 SO 27 8 5 13 0.481
2021-22 New England D3 FR 26 5 2 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2021-22 · New England
+915.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17048
Forward overall
#1657
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Princeton ·
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.