← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ava Bullert Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 2 3 5 0.208 0.0315 0.0315
2019-20 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 7 17 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450
2020-21 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 7 11 18 0.900 0.1359 0.1359
2021-22 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 15 15 30 1.154 0.1742 0.1742
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 1 0 1 1 1.000
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 28 7 8 15 0.536
2022-23 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 20 2 5 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
+249.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5025
Forward overall
#208
Forward born in 2003
#961
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.