IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Emma-Lyn Stephenson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Chippewa Falls/Menomonie USHS-W 5 2 1 3 0.600 0.1804 0.1804 — —
2020-21 Chippewa Falls/Menomonie USHS-W 16 2 5 7 0.438 0.1316 0.1316 — —
2022-23 Chippewa Falls/Menomonie USHS-W 23 12 13 25 1.087 0.3269 0.3269 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 — — 27 2 5 7 0.259
2024-25 Trine D3 — — 27 2 5 7 0.259
2023-24 Trine D3 — — 27 0 2 2 0.074
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · Trine
-73.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3074
Forward overall
#1089
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.16 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota State ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.