IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lizzy Hamel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 2 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
2020-21 Minneapolis High (W) USHS-MN-W 18 12 8 20 1.111 0.1678 0.1678 — —
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 15 3 4 7 0.467 0.0705 0.0705 — —
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 26 16 9 25 0.962 0.1452 0.1410 — —
2023-24 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 27 12 11 23 0.852 0.1286 0.1195 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Colby D3 NESCAC — 20 3 3 6 0.300
2024-25 Colby D3 NESCAC — 19 2 4 6 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2024-25 · Colby
+188.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6519
Forward overall
#285
Forward born in 2006
#1540
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Tianna Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Renee Saltness
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rose Rather
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Janna Haeg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kendall Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tianna Gunderson
Minnesota ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Renee Saltness
Quinnipiac ·
0.029 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rose Rather
Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.