IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Julie Barlow Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 2 7 9 0.321 0.0736 0.0754 — —
2023-24 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 2 9 11 0.367 0.0840 0.0820 — —
2024-25 SAHA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 27 6 7 13 0.481 0.1103 0.1020 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 26 2 4 6 0.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · Concordia Wisconsin
+186.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8517
Forward overall
#406
Forward born in 2007
#271
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Kourtney Menches
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kourtney Menches
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kippin Keller
Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Johnson
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.