IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erika Roepke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 3 2 5 0.217 0.0328 0.0328 — —
2019-20 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 6 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2020-21 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0151 0.0151 — —
2021-22 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 8 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785 — —
2022-23 Woodbury High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.0302 0.0302 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 — JR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2024-25 Arcadia D3 — — 8 0 2 2 0.250
2023-24 Arcadia D3 — — 20 2 2 4 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2023-24 · Arcadia
+371.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12540
Forward overall
#4873
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Megan Berg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katie Huntington
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Morgan McKim
Cornell ·
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sharon Frankel
Princeton ·
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.