← New Search ↗ Social Card

Veda Roeske Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 10 0 1 1 0.100 0.0151 0.0151
2019-20 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 0 1 1 0.053 0.0079 0.0079
2020-21 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 2 6 8 0.348 0.0525 0.0525
2021-22 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 1 4 5 0.185 0.0280 0.0280
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Superior D3 27 3 2 5 0.185
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 7 1 0 1 0.143
2023-24 Wisconsin-Superior D3 21 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Wisconsin-Superior D3 21 1 3 4 0.190
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · Wisconsin-Superior
+779.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6444
Defenseman overall
#5817
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Brown
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

RIT ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lindenwood ·
0.091 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.