← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gretta Pioske Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 9 3 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725
2019-20 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 25 10 15 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510
2020-21 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 17 15 11 26 1.529 0.2309 0.2309
2021-22 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 26 21 22 43 1.654 0.2497 0.2497
2022-23 Westonka/SW Christian High USHS-MN-W 27 20 19 39 1.444 0.2181 0.1998
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC JR 21 2 3 5 0.238
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC 17 2 1 3 0.176
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W 28 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2932
Forward overall
#101
Forward born in 2005
#343
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2024-25
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2014-15
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.