Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | — | CAHS-W | 47 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.362 | 0.1298 | 0.1298 |
| 2021-22 | OHA Mavericks Tardiff U22 | OWHL-U22 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.200 | 0.0700 | 0.0700 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | SR | 24 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.208 |
| 2024-25 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | JR | 19 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.368 |
| 2024-25 | UConn | HEA-W | FR | 18 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.389 |
| 2023-24 | Connecticut College | NESCAC | SO | 22 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.318 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Sierra Semmel | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG | 0.000 | Maine |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Patnode | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
| Jess Eykyn | 2023-24 · 1.88 PPG | 0.136 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Lucy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
| Maddy Skogman | 2023-24 · 0.90 PPG | 0.280 | Concordia | MIAC |
| Allie LeClaire | 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG | 0.333 | Wisconsin-Eau Claire | WIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.