IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erika Parenti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lac St-Louis Warriors M18 AAA(W) QMAAA-W 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Worcester Academy NE-Prep-Girls 20 6 10 16 0.800 0.4964 0.4964 — —
2022-23 Worcester Academy USHS-W 25 9 15 24 0.960 0.2887 0.2887 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 — — 26 2 3 5 0.192
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 — — 27 5 8 13 0.481
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 — — 25 3 8 11 0.440
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2023-24 · SUNY Oswego
+38.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1547
Forward overall
#54
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Molly Strabley
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.