← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Digrazia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.07
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0829
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.17
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1932
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

2%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
98%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2021-22 Arizona Kachinas 16U AAA 16U-AAA-W 51 8 8 16 0.314 0.1007 0.1007
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Utica UCHC FR 27 2 3 5 0.185

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Kippin Keller USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG 0.056 Minnesota
Mac Johnson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.125 St. Cloud State
Abby Halluska USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.314 Bemidji State
Rebecca Freiburger USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.278 Ohio State
Sophia Kunin USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG 0.425 Wisconsin

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Olivia Patnode 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG Saint Mary's MIAC
Lucy Peterson 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Macy Janssen 2022-23 · 0.74 PPG 0.333 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Maddy Skogman 2023-24 · 0.90 PPG 0.280 Concordia MIAC
Jorja Jusczak 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG 0.240 Saint Benedict MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.