Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Eden Prairie High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2020-21 | Eden Prairie High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | N/A | N/A |
| 2021-22 | Eden Prairie High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.038 | 0.0058 | 0.0058 |
| 2022-23 | Eden Prairie High (W) | USHS-MN-W | 26 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.192 | 0.0290 | 0.0260 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Lake Forest | NCHA | JR | 28 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.179 |
| 2024-25 | Lake Forest | NCHA | SO | 28 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.179 |
| 2023-24 | Lake Forest | NCHA | FR | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Megan Berg | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Olivia Arkell | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Mallory Rushton | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG | 0.125 | RIT |
| Katie Huntington | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.000 | Quinnipiac |
| Morgan McKim | NE-Prep-Girls · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG | 0.087 | Cornell |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alaina Hedberg | 2023-24 · 0.58 PPG | 0.111 | St. Scholastica | NCHA |
| Johanna Eidensten | 2011-12 · 0.16 PPG | 0.429 | Elmira | UCHC |
| Bryn Etzell | 2023-24 · 0.31 PPG | 0.200 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
| Lexie Weiss | 2013-14 · 1.57 PPG | 0.037 | Wisconsin-Superior | WIAC |
| Anna Tude | 2010-11 · 0.29 PPG | 0.214 | Elmira | UCHC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.