IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lily McKenzie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-03-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 27 7 7 14 0.518 0.0783 0.0783 — —
2022-23 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 26 16 25 41 1.577 0.2381 0.2402 — —
2023-24 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 27 18 29 47 1.741 0.2628 0.2541 — —
2024-25 River Cities Blades (women) USHS-MN-W 27 24 25 49 1.815 0.2740 0.2544 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 WIAC FR 19 2 2 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2025-26 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-3.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2370
Forward overall
#65
Forward born in 2007
#230
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christi Vetter
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG
→ Penn State
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Williamson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alyssa Hulst
Norwich · 2014-15
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Anderson
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Lemker
Saint Benedict · 2015-16
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.