← New Search ↗ Social Card

Molly Grundhoffer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Mankato West High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 4 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423
2018-19 Mankato West High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 23 14 37 1.542 0.2328 0.2328
2019-20 Mankato West High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 27 10 37 1.542 0.2328 0.2328
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 44 10 9 19 0.432 0.1298 0.1298
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 56 8 12 20 0.357 0.1074 0.1074
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC 26 1 3 4 0.154
2024-25 Augsburg D3 MIAC 25 9 2 11 0.440
2022-23 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 11 1 0 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · St. Thomas
-32.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5856
Forward overall
#269
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Colgate
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.76 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.303 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.