IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayne Gamburg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 16U 16U-AAA-W 60 2 5 7 0.117 0.0523 0.0534 — —
2023-24 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 16U 16U-AAA-W 68 8 12 20 0.294 0.1319 0.1290 — —
2024-25 Philadelphia Jr Flyers 19U JWHL-U19 21 6 7 13 0.619 0.2324 0.2296 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 22 0 4 4 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2025-26 · SUNY Potsdam
+12.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5888
Forward overall
#264
Forward born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Wente
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.