← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiko Sims Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-05-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 21 0 2 2 0.095 0.0144 0.0144
2019-20 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 25 2 0 2 0.080 0.0121 0.0121
2020-21 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 19 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 24 8 8 16 0.667 0.1007 0.1007
2022-23 Breck School (W) USHS-MN-W 1 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC 25 1 2 3 0.120
2024-25 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC 23 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC 19 1 1 2 0.105
2022-23 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2022-23 · Wesleyan
+194.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11860
Forward overall
#564
Forward born in 2004
#4350
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.