IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josephine Mahlum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 24 3 2 5 0.208 0.0315 0.0315 — —
2019-20 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 24 8 3 11 0.458 0.0692 0.0692 — —
2020-21 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 18 2 4 6 0.333 0.0503 0.0503 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 11 1 0 1 0.091
2024-25 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 28 8 8 16 0.571
2023-24 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 28 13 15 28 1.000
2022-23 St. Norbert D3 NCHA — 28 4 6 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2022-23 · St. Norbert
+1222.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11528
Forward overall
#488
Forward born in 2003
#4148
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Megan Berg
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sharon Frankel
Princeton ·
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Huntington
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Morgan McKim
Cornell ·
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.