IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Macy Janssen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 25 3 3 6 0.240 0.0362 0.0362 — —
2020-21 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 19 6 6 12 0.632 0.0954 0.0954 — —
2021-22 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 27 10 10 20 0.741 0.1118 0.1118 — —
2022-23 Blaine High USHS-MN-W 27 9 11 20 0.741 0.1118 0.1001 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 28 1 0 1 0.036
2024-25 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 27 4 4 8 0.296
2023-24 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 24 4 4 8 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2023-24 · Gustavus Adolphus
+271.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
95%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7240
Forward overall
#346
Forward born in 2004
#1828
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kourtney Menches
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kippin Keller
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Abby Halluska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Freiburger
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kourtney Menches
Vermont ·
0.083 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kippin Keller
Minnesota ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mac Johnson
St. Cloud State ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.