IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jess Eykyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 4 3 7 0.304 0.0459 0.0459 — —
2020-21 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 7 7 14 0.737 0.1113 0.1113 — —
2021-22 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 29 23 52 1.793 0.2708 0.2708 — —
2022-23 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 21 15 36 1.241 0.1875 0.1765 — —
2023-24 Mankato East High (W) USHS-MN-W 26 31 18 49 1.885 0.2846 0.2559 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 8 0 1 1 0.125
2024-25 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 — — 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-29.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2571
Forward overall
#82
Forward born in 2005
#265
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Christi Vetter
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG
→ Penn State
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Charly Dalhquist
North Dakota ·
0.241 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota State ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.